proxy subjective health status or evaluation measures
When proxy subjective health status or evaluation measures are used to determine children’s health or those unable to speak for themselves, there is an underlying assumption that the person doing the evaluation is accurately and appropriately interpreting the situation. This can be a difficult task – even trained professionals may come to different conclusions about an individual’s health based on the same facts. If a wrong decision is made in this context, it could have serious long-term ramifications for an individual’s physical, mental, and emotional well-being.
Thus, it is essential to ensure that any proxy evaluations are backed up by sufficient evidence and professional medical opinions. Furthermore, adequate safeguards must be in place so that if a mistake is made in determining someone’s health or well-being, it can be corrected promptly, and appropriate corrective action is taken.
Finally, those conducting the evaluations must ensure they use the most up-to-date evidence and methods available. By doing so, we can reduce the likelihood of any inaccuracies or mistakes leading to long-term harm for those unable to speak for themselves.
In conclusion, using proxy subjective health status or evaluation measures for those unable to speak for themselves may be necessary in some cases; however, the underlying assumptions and potential ramifications must be fully understood. Taking the necessary steps to ensure accuracy and safeguards will help minimize any mistakes and ensure everyone receives the care they need.
Discuss the underlying assumptions and potential ramifications of having proxy subjective health status or evaluation measures for children or those unable to speak for themselves.
450 words. APA 7th edition. 2 references within 5 years.
WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT TWO (2) DIFFERENT DISCUSSION POST REPLIES ARE ALSO REQUESTED. 200 WORDS WITH 1-2 DIFFERENT REFERENCES EACH.