Mini Systematic Literature Review AND Thesis Statement
A systematic review is an analysis of previous research. It tries to compile all available data on a specific subject to respond to a particular research question. Before beginning the systematic review, authors develop criteria for selecting which evidence is included or eliminated. As a result, there is a lower chance of bias, and the results are more trustworthy.
Systematic evaluations ought to:
• Clearly define objectives and use a repeatable technique;
• use a thorough search approach to try to find all studies that satisfy the requirements;
• evaluate the veracity of the results of the studies that were included; and
• systematically synthesize the findings of the studies.
Writing a systematic review: Steps to follow.
1. Create a study hypothesis.
Before beginning your project, consider whether a systematic review is necessary. Has a book been written on your subject already? You can get information from librarians. Determine if you have the time and resources necessary for a systematic review. Remember that it can take more than a year to finish. Choose a group of coworkers to assist you. This lowers the chance of prejudice.
Put your subject into the “Well-Built Clinical Question” framework to start your systematic review. Your query should focus on PICO’s four fundamental components. For a review, see our guide on Evidence-Based Practice.
2. developing a research procedure
A research protocol outlines steps to investigate a biomedical or health sciences issue. Systematic review protocols should contain information like:
Goals for your project;
Information on the procedures and strategies that will be used;
eligibility requirements for particular research (such as study design);
How information will be gleaned from specific studies, and
What research will be done?
Think about registering your review protocol with PROSPERO for free. PROSPERO accepts reviews with conclusions about health, particularly those dealing with:
Social and medical services,
Justice and crime, and
3. search the literature
The Institute of Medicine advises working with a librarian when creating your search strategy. Your literature search should be exhaustive because your objective is to identify all the pertinent papers on your subject. A librarian will work with you to choose databases pertinent to your subject and develop a thorough search plan. Additionally, it would help if you looked outside of the conventional academic publishing scene. This is frequently referred to as “grey literature,” It may entail looking through pharmaceutical company websites and conference papers and getting in touch with specialists. Because unfavorable outcomes are less likely to be reported, the grey literature is significant. This will impact the veracity of your findings.
Maintain thorough records as you seek. Document specifics like:
The dates that each of the databases you searched covers;
dates of the initial and updated searches;
Information on the tactics utilized, including the search phrases; and
Number of outcomes attained.
Consider using a citation manager as well. These tools allow users to make bibliographies, eliminate duplicate entries, and collaborate on citations.
4. a few studies, as per the protocol
Two reviewers should be responsible for the studies’ initial screening. Utilize the standards listed in your procedure. Titles and abstracts may be used as the basis for the initial screening. It is recommended to perform a second round of screening by reviewing the full-text versions of the chosen papers. Reviewers should preserve a record of excluded studies, together with the justification for the exclusion.
5. evaluate investigations by the procedure
A group of at least two reviewers should assess the level of the methodology used in a sample of full-text articles. Use a checklist to check whether studies adhere to the protocol’s requirements. You might want to think about the following inquiries:
Were the patients divided up into groups at random;
was the allocation order withheld from patients and medical professionals;
Could bias have affected the study’s conclusions?
6. Take data out
Make a form for data extraction. Assign at least two reviewers to collect data from the included studies. Researchers can customize several Cochrane templates for specific projects.
7. Analyze outcomes
If applicable, build a forest plot to show the relative strength of treatment effects and create a table of study findings. Analyze the data to check for problems like heterogeneity—the difference between studies—and the sensitivity of the results. Think about performing a results meta-analysis. Make a list of the studies that were excluded available to readers.
8. Interpret outcomes
Please consider the following: restrictions (including biases), the quality of the evidence, its applicability, the ramifications for the economy, and future practice or study. The Cochrane Handbook offers comprehensive instructions on assessing findings and developing conclusions.
Mini Systematic Literature Review AND Thesis Statement
This week, you will write a mini-scientific literature review. It is mini because you will only be reviewing two sources.
For this literature review assignment, we are going to choice the following topic
- HIV/AIDS – Treatment mechanisms and prevention strategies
REMEMBER, in a scientific review, focus your analysis on author’s hypothesis (thesis), scientific method used in the research, and the results of the study presented. In a scientific literature review, the reviewer (you) identifies what he/she perceives as the strengths and weaknesses of the study, and analyzes the author’s findings and conclusions.
For this review, BE SURE TO:
- 1-Select two relevant and appropriate scholarly articles that address the topic you chose.
- 2-Present a thorough literature review of both articles by summarizing, synthesizing, and evaluating the materials.
- 3-Demonstrate understanding of the content presented in the articles.
- 4-Include a critical assessment of the sources. Do not simply include a summary of what you have read.
- 5-Incorporate citations into your body paragraphs; incorporate the essential and most relevant supporting evidence eloquently and appropriately.
- 6-Present your writing in a clear, organized manner.
- 7-Provide a strong INTRODUCTION and CONCLUSION, including further questions for research.
- Use proper APA format with proper citations. Review APA Citations Here(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Your literature review should be 3 pages in length. Remember, you will need to use APA formatting in your literature review and include a title page and a reference page no older than 5 years ago. The title and reference pages to not count toward total page count
PLEASE ADHERED TO THE INSTRUCTIONS , EVERY POINT MUST BE INCLUDED, AS WELL AS INTRODUCTION ADN CONCLUSION
Identify a TOPIC related to health care and leadership. Make sure that your leadership in healthcare topic is neither too broad nor too narrow.
Consider some of the following general areas:
- Change management in health care
- Technology in health care
- Finance of health care
- Conflict management in health care
- Evidence-based protocols
- Gender equality in the workplace
- Health sector reform
- Embedded safeguards to reduce injury and infection
Please note the above general areas must have a narrower focus in order to work well for the FUTURE research paper. The list above is not exhaustive, but merely suggestions.
Identify a research area and then develop a thesis statement for your research paper. Ensure your topic is presented in descriptive detail and a clear plan for the research paper is identified. Submit a 2-pages, double-spaced paper identifying YOUR TOPIC DESCRIPTIVE DETAIL, including a CLEAR PLAN for your research and a thesis statement.
If you need help creating a thesis statement, view the attached document:
YOU CAN SELECT THE TOPIC BUT PLEASE CHOOSE IT ACCORDING THE SUGGESTION BY INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE NOTE THAT.
- NO PLAGIARISM
- INCLUDE REFERENCES NO OLDER THAN 5 YEAR AGO.
- DUE DATE 11/5/2022