Your assignment is just a click away

We have the best writers

We guarantee you plagiarism free, well formatted, grad A+ papers!

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case

Legal Case Rubric
Legal Case Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations Advanced Meets
Expectations Intermediate
Needs Improvement Novice
Inadequate Total
Identify defendant. Use of legal standards when analyzing potential medical malpractice: duty, breach of duty, causation, damages and negligence All components very well-demonstrated

30 points All components generally well demonstrated or some very well exhibited but not all elements included

26 points Components addressed to a more limited extent or some generally well described but others missing or minimally described

23 points Minimal discussion of each or many missing elements

20 points 30
Scholarly discussion of standard of care of the practice issues relevant to the case. If applicable differential diagnosis. Thinks critically about relationship of legal issues and standard of care.

30 points Generally discusses relationship of legal issues and standard of care.

26 points Limited discussion and critical thinking about relationship of legal issues and standard of care.

23 points No or minimal critical thinking apparent. Incomplete discussion about legal issues and standard of care.

20 points 30
Demonstrates synthesis of legal issues as they apply to personal professional practice. Describes complexity of legal issues as they apply to personal future practice

25 points Basically describes legal issues as they apply to personal future practice

22 points Does not clearly discuss legal issues as they apply to personal future practice

19 points Does not identify or discuss legal issues as they apply to personal future practice

17 points 25
Support prediction of case verdict with sound logic thread grounded by legal concepts Consistently & accurately uses synthesis & evaluation

5 points Generally uses synthesis and evaluation

4 points Sometimes uses synthesis and evaluation

3 points Inaccurately or minimally uses synthesis & evaluation

2 points 5
Professional Application Major elements of the paper are supported by evidence based articles/guidelines

5 points Elements only partially supported by evidence based articles/guidelines

4 points Poor quality or applicability of evidence based articles/guidelines

3 points Does not include evidence based reference

2 points 5
Technical aspects of paper: Grammar, spelling, Intelligible, Quality of writing/organization of paper; and use of APA Consistently demonstrates appropriate format
Easy to follow clear quality and organization of paper

5 points Generally demonstrates appropriate format
Mostly easy to follow quality and organization of paper

4 points Occasionally follows appropriate format lacks organization and clarity

3 points Rarely uses appropriate format
Ineffective organization and clarity

2 points 5
Total Points 100

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case

Legal cases study.
Name of Student
Course Title
Institutional Affiliation

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case
From the case study of Rafael, the defendant is the medical practitioner. There are several instances where the nurse practitioner practiced negligence on the patient’s care. For example, the first time Rafael was seen at the practitioner’s place, he complained of cramping and abdominal burnings. The patient also complained of inability to eat for a couple of weeks. These complaints were resolved as of the appointment and the medical practitioner scheduled the patient’s physical exam the following month. The medical practitioner also prescribed Zantac without running tests to know the exact medical problem. P5rofessionally, when a patient reports to a medical facility, it is categorical to do a medical background check and medical tests before settling on a prescription. That was an instance of negligence from this case.
Given The Patient’s Symptoms Listed Above, Provide A Comprehensive Differential Diagnoses List (Only A-List)
Rapid mortality
Slow motility
Steroids and immunosuppressive medications ((Joel, 2017)
Reflect on this case and what you would have done differently as an advanced practice registered nurse.
Upon the patient’s arrival at the clinic, as an advanced medical practitioner, I would have recorded the symptoms and checked the patient’s medical background before prescribing any medications (Nugteren et al., 2017). I would also arrange for an immediate physical examination to give the most appropriate medical care.
Review the risks that NPs face associated with practice identified in Buppert (2018) p. 289 and determine which of these applies to the case. What strategies might have reduced the risk of the outcome presented in this case
From the case provided, the NP may face the risk of medication and diagnosis claims. They also face charges of failure to adhere to their profession’s scope of practice. Proper medical background checks and adherence to nursing practices, which involves appropriate medical tests, might have reduced or changed the risk of the patient’s outcome (Buppert, 2020).
Why do you think the verdict was, and why?
The nursing practitioner was found guilty of negligence. The patient died, and the medical care provided was not per the medical nursing practice.

Buppert, C. (2020). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Joel, L. A. (2017). Advanced practice nursing: Essentials for role development. F.A. Davis.
Nugteren, I. C., Duineveld, L. A., Wieldraaijer, T., van Weert, H. C., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., & Wind, J. (2017). Need for general practitioner involvement and eHealth in colon cancer survivorship care: patients’ perspectives. Family practice, 34(4), 473-478.

Identify The Defendant And The Areas Of Negligence In This Case

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Nursing Solved only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Nursing Solved are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Nursing Solved is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Nursing Solved we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.